About 73,500 results
Bokep
- Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.law.jrank.org/pages/9576/Punishment-THEORIES …We can, however, describe the two accounts in general terms, as follows: the utilitarian argues ― 68 ― that we should punish only when doing so would augment social utility; the retributivist objects, saying that we must punish those who do wrong, even if doing so diminishes social utility, because justice demands that we punish.publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft4…Utilitarian goals consider the costs and the benefits of punishment; the focus is on the future, with aims reached through a reduction in the likelihood of the misdeed by the perpetrator ancb'or by others in society (Murphy and Coleman, 1990). The second major category of punishment aims is retributive.www.academia.edu/17370087/An_attributional_ex…
- People also ask
Theories of Punishment - Utilitarian vs. Retribution Theorists
How can punishment be justified? On Kant’s Retributivism
In Sentencing, Utilitarianism vs. Retributivism - NYTimes.com
Retributive Justice - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Retributive justice | Penology, Punishment & Restorative Justice
Retributive vs utilitarian justice - netivist
Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy - Oxford Academic
Feinberg on punishment - Pomona College
An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian ...
Related searches for utilitarian vs retributive punishment