Bokep
https://viralbokep.com/viral+bokep+terbaru+2021&FORM=R5FD6Aug 11, 2021 · Bokep Indo Skandal Baru 2021 Lagi Viral - Nonton Bokep hanya Itubokep.shop Bokep Indo Skandal Baru 2021 Lagi Viral, Situs nonton film bokep terbaru dan terlengkap 2020 Bokep ABG Indonesia Bokep Viral 2020, Nonton Video Bokep, Film Bokep, Video Bokep Terbaru, Video Bokep Indo, Video Bokep Barat, Video Bokep Jepang, Video Bokep, Streaming Video …
- Provide to and provide for are both correct ways of saying that you give something to someone12. They have slightly different meanings, however. Provide to implies a neutral transfer of something3. Provide for implies a positive or caring act of giving something3. For example, you can provide information to a customer, or provide food for a hungry child.Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.When “provide” is followed by a direct object, English speakers can use the prepositions “to” or “for.” Provide (something) to/for (someone) means that you deliver or give something to someone.learningenglish.voanews.com/a/everyday-gramma…Both versions have two objects, a person who receives and a thing that is given. Either of these can be the direct object. The other will be followed by a preposition, or omitted. So you can say either: provide [RECEIVER] with [SOMETHING] or provide [SOMETHING] (for [RECEIVER])forum.wordreference.com/threads/provide-provide …Both "provide to" and "provide for" are grammatical, idiomatic, and common. Neither is wrong, and they mean essentially the same thing. They differ only in nuance: the "to" has a sense of transference. It's neutral. The plants supply food to the fungi. The "for" has a sense of cultivation. It's positive.ell.stackexchange.com/questions/83902/provide-to …
provide something to/for someone | WordReference Forums
WEBApr 2, 2016 · The general distinction, Gandalf, is that "provide something to someone" says that it's provided directly to the person concerned. Whereas with "provide something for someone", it might be provided to an intermediary.
Explore further
provide ... to vs provide ... for | WordReference Forums
WEBSep 18, 2021 · I'd only use 'for'. I can't recall ever having come across 'provide something to someone'. You supply something to someone, you provide someone with something or …
provide for/to... | WordReference Forums
WEBJun 13, 2005 · Should I use "to" or "for" here: (...) to provide additional features to/for the end user. t. Prefer "...to provide......for the end user". Equally good "...to provide the …
provide services <for / to> someone | WordReference Forums
WEBApr 29, 2014 · Financial companies provide services to customers. Some dictonaries list: provide something for/to somebody (for example Macmillan dictionary), others only …
provide context to/for something | WordReference Forums
WEBDec 14, 2016 · To add context to and to provide context for are the usual collocations. You must log in or register to reply here. I hope that this additional findings will provide …
Provide with/for/to | WordReference Forums
WEBFeb 21, 2014 · Your first sentence is fine. As to the difference between "I provide a pen for you" and "I provide a pen to you": Both are correct; I guess the different is rather subtle. …
providing evidence of/for/to? | WordReference Forums
WEBJan 7, 2021 · What's the difference between. This action provides evidence of her kindness. This action provides evidence for her kindness. This action provides evidence to show …
provide with vs provide to | WordReference Forums
WEBMar 11, 2021 · Provide (something) to/for: When “provide” is followed by a direct object, English speakers can use the prepositions “to” or “for.” Provide (something) to/for …
provide to | WordReference Forums
WEBJul 9, 2008 · The dictionary only lists provide for but I googled provide to and there were several cases in which I saw it with to: e.g. Services we can provide to school boards; …
provide something for someone/provide someone with something
WEBFeb 5, 2015 · I think both "to" and "for" are completely correct. The reason teachers insist that only "for" is correct is that "providing something for someone" is a fixed expression, …
provide / provide for | WordReference Forums
WEBOct 6, 2010 · I'm a lawyer and I need very often to use "provide" in the agreements I draft. Example: Is it correct to say "this agreement provides FOR the terms and conditions …
provide for vs provide | WordReference Forums
WEBNov 23, 2013 · The first one I found – which also answers your question – is Provide 'for'. Basically, it means to make an allowance for (space for, in this case). It doesn't mean …
allow for/provide for | WordReference Forums
WEBOct 4, 2016. #3. dojibear said: I would not say something "allows opportunities". It is normal to say something "provides opportunities" or "offers opportunities". Thank you, Dojibear. …
provide someone something | WordReference Forums
WEBNov 5, 2014 · It sounds all right to me either with or without "with". The verb "provide" works both ways: you can provide things to people, or you can provide people with things.
support to or for | WordReference Forums
WEBMay 14, 2019. #2. "To" is wrong. Of = associated with. For = in the matter of; concerning; (with a nuance of "to the benefit of; in favour of") However, the sentence, as a whole, is a …
"Provide me with" or "Provide me" | WordReference Forums
WEBOct 28, 2019 · Please provide a full sentence in which you intend to use these expressions. "Would you provide us with rations?" or. "Would you provide us rations?"
provide, provide with | WordReference Forums
WEBOct 7, 2005 · provide [RECEIVER] with [SOMETHING] or provide [SOMETHING] (for [RECEIVER]) Some examples of the first use: - We will provide all conference …
beneficial to or for | WordReference Forums
WEBApr 14, 2016 · General Writing and Grammar Help: usage of the word "beneficial", object of a preposition, progressive verb. The tricky part is that both "to" and "for" also can serve …
provide to / provide with | WordReference Forums
WEBAug 30, 2010 · Your first sentence would be idiomatically correct. The second one is understandable, but "provide to" shouldn't be used to refer to sth. intangible like …
approval to/ for | WordReference Forums
WEBJul 23, 2013. #4. In that sentence the "to" is there because of the verb "give," not because of the word "approval." It has the same structure as a simple sentence like "He had given …
provide to us VS provide us with | WordReference Forums
WEBFeb 18, 2013 · A preposition is a perfectly appropriate kind of word to end a sentence with. (...) JustKate said: "Provides to us," "provides us with" and "provides us" all sound fine …
evidence for or evidence of | WordReference Forums
WEBSep 23, 2009 · True. ''evidence of'' is more often followed by a noun in single, like in ''evidence of a crime''. ''For'' is more often used when there is a verb following, or the …
to provide vs to providing | WordReference Forums
WEBAug 21, 2011 · Provide and providing are both acceptable and are interchangeable in the construction you give. It is coincidental that the sentence is broken up differently by …
Related searches for provide to or for site:forum.wordreference.com
- Some results have been removed
Skip to content
