About 318,000 results
Bokep
- Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.So is Wikipedia a credible source? Many of the entries are well-documented, checked for quality and — as opposed to reference books — often completely up-to-date, but, 20 years after its creation, the online encyclopedia is not 100% reliable, because information can be manipulated, and sometimes almost undetectably.www.dw.com/en/fact-check-as-wikipedia-turns-20-…Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source you should cite in your research papers. Wikipedia allows all kinds of different users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked before publishing them.paperpile.com/g/wikipedia-credible-source/In Wikipedia or Wickedpedia? (2008), the Hoover Institution said Wikipedia is an unreliable resource for correct knowledge, information, and facts about a subject, because, as an open-source website, the editorial content of the articles is readily subjected to manipulation and propaganda.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_WikipediaWikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a…The reliability of the project has been tested statistically through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in its editing process. The online encyclopedia has been criticized for its factual unreliability, principally regarding its content, presentation, and editorial processes.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia
- People also ask
Explore further
WebJun 10, 2021 · Wikipedia’s strong internet presence for two decades is hard to dismiss. Yet, many people choose to keep the fact that they use it a secret. And it may have something to do with the fact that...
What’s Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources
WebSep 13, 2022 · They say you can’t trust Wikipedia, but research suggests that the sheer number of people contributing and reviewing information means it is likely as accurate as competing encyclopaedias.
Is Wikipedia accurate? Study shows Wikipedia's Accuracy is 99.5%
WebMar 20, 2023 · X (Twitter) What comes to mind when you think of Wikipedia? Maybe you think of clicking link after link to learn about a topic, followed by another topic and then another. Or maybe you’ve heard a...
Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia
Can we trust Wikipedia? 1.4 billion people can't be wrong
Wikipedia : Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations …
Why getting medical information from Wikipedia isn’t always a …
Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic research? - Scribbr
Why Wikipedia Isn’t as Credible as You Might Think - MUO
Wikipedia's 20, but how credible is it? – DW – 01/14/2021
Wikipedia: The Most Reliable Source on the Internet? | PCMag
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still …
Wikipedia – an unreliable source : Networks Course blog for …
Is Wikipedia a credible source? - Paperpile
Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia
Greatest mechanical calculating devices of all time - Boing Boing
Umpire Ángel Hernández, who unsuccessfully sued MLB for racial ...
Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia
Related searches for is wikipedia actually unreliable